What to do about pit bulls and dangerous dogs in our community

Leave a comment


By Councillor Mike Cohen:


While the Quebec government studies the issues of dangerous dogs and consults with municipalities, many of which have already implemented bans on pit bulls in particular, the City of Côte Saint-Luc is reinforcing an existing bylaw.

Our most recent bylaw regarding dangerous dogs was adopted in 2009. In the wake of a series of high-profile dog attacks, Public Safety Department has sent letters to current owners of pit bulls in our community that we have on record, asking that they be muzzled.
According to our bylaw, a dangerous dog” means: a dog which has a propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack, bite, threaten, or injure, with or without provocation, any persons, property or other animals; with or without provocation or physical injury, attacks, bites, or threatens any person, property; a domestic animal that has been trained for dog fighting or to attack upon a command . In the event that the owner and/or custodian of a dangerous dog fails to comply with the obligation to muzzle the animal when on any public property throughout the city of Côte Saint-Luc, he shall be liable to a fine.

Pit Bull

Is this strong enough? As the city councillor responsible for Animal Protection, I know how it must feel for someone who has a pet they love, only to be threatened to have it taken away via legislation. Several municipalities do have laws on the books banning pit bulls. However, they are not the only breeds that pose a threat. We will wait to see what the Quebec government decides for that will impact on our future actions. In the meantime, I wish to urge the owners of dogs considered to be dangerous to please use a muzzle.

The City of Laval wants Ottawa to make changes to the Criminal Code of Canada to create uniform rules across the country to deal with the problem of dangerous dogs.Right now, it’s possible to charge owners of dogs who attack people with criminal negligence, but it rarely happens. Laval Mayor Marc Demers said that the article in the Criminal Code dealing with criminal negligence should be amended to make specific reference to the responsibilities of dog owners.”We would like the federal government to do its homework, so it would be all across Canada the same thing, it won’t change from city to city,” Demers told CBC News.”That way, across the country, if you bring up your dog to be vicious so he may attack somebody, you are responsible for that.”
In recent weeks we have had some disturbing incidents in our own community. At one park, three people with large dogs (a pit bull, a rottweiler and another breed ) were approached by a Public Security agent and asked to leave the premises with the dogs. The owner responded that her dogs were trained to attack on command and loosened her grip on the leash. Fearing for his safety, the agent called immediately for police back-up who arrived, handcuffed the woman in the back of the police car and pointed a Taser at one of the men. Police declarations were filled out and we believe charges were filed against one or all of the individuals involved.
Meanwhile, we had a pit bull attack when the dog escaped from a ground floor apartment and attacked a pug. The dog in question already had a muzzle order in place. Public Security and police were on scene. We issued tickets and the police pressed criminal negligence charges against the owner.
As of January 1, 2017, any dog on a list of banned breeds will be prohibited. Anyone caught with a banned dog will be subject to a fine of up to $1,000 for a first offence. The City of Montreal is working to come up with a uniform set of rules regarding “dangerous dogs” across its 19 boroughs, but won’t say if it’s leaning toward an all-out ban on any particular breed. Here is a recent TV report.
In Ontario a pit bull ban was proposed in 2004 after a number of cases in which people were badly injured in pit bull attacks. It was passed in 2005. “The legislation bans pit bulls in Ontario, places restrictions on existing pit bulls, and toughens the penalties for the owners of any dog that poses a danger to the public,” Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General says on its website.
The legislation, called the Dog Owners’ Liability Act, defines a pit bull as a pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American pit bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier or any dog “that has an appearance and physical characteristics that are substantially similar.

CSL Pooper scooper patrol will be out in force

Leave a comment


Councillor Mike Cohen blogs about piles of poop!  Dog owners: Be sure you have a bag (preferably compostable) and shovel in hand when you walk your K-9 on a leash.  Public Security will be enforcing bylaws to ensure public safety and cleanliness.

  • All dogs must…
  • Have a license
  • Be on a leash when outdoors (except for your own fenced in backyard or the CSL dog run)
  • Not be in parks or playgrounds, city fields, school fields or anywhere else where signs are posted
  • Be scooped after they poop

Please refer to the City Bylaws for full details.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Read Councillor Cohen’s blog:

MikeCohen.ca: CSL Pooper scooper patrol will be out in force.

No farm animals allowed: CSL

Leave a comment

No farm animals allowed: CSL

Many municipalities have little-known bylaws

By Joel Goldenberg

The Suburban

March 3, 2010

Côte St. Luc has many well-known and publicized bylaws – perhaps its most famous are its overnight parking prohibition between 3 and 6 a.m., its pioneering requirement for bicyclists to wear helmets and also innovative ban on smoking in public places, well before Quebec made the latter province-wide law.

Other bylaws are obvious and by no means unique – putting out garbage at the correct time, keeping your dog leashed and out of parks, and no unauthorized parking in handicap zones.

But others are less obvious. Côte St. Luc’s website lists many of them. In that city, you can’t:

1. “Keep live farm animals or fowl on your land,” so do not expect to find any live cows, chickens or turkeys in local backyards and homes. There have been no such incidences in Côte St. Luc, The Suburban has been told, at least in recent years.

2. “Park a trailer, truck anywhere except for loading or unloading purposes.” However, in neighbouring Hampstead, one can frequently find trucks and trailers parked on Glenmore, at a home where the filming of major motion pictures has taken place over the years, to the annoyance of some residents.

3. “Put more than a total of six receptacles or plastic bags outside a building for garbage collection.” In this case, a major spring cleaning should take place over time.

4 “Make loud noises such as excessively honking your horn, blaring loud music or using any other sound reproduction device to do so.” So no bass-heavy rap music on Côte St. Luc streets.

5. “Feed pigeons, squirrels and other wild animals or poultry.” Bylaw #1 should take care of much of that issue.

In Hampstead, one otherwise little known bylaw has been gaining more prominence at monthly council meetings, the prohibition against speaking from the floor except during question period. Thanks to frequent violations by some council regulars and Mayor William Steinberg ordering a ticket issued during a council meeting – the order was later withdrawn and switched to a warning – that bylaw has been well publicized.

Other interesting bylaws also relate to decorum at council meetings. An attendee can be expelled if he or she is verbally disruptive, but also disruptive from a motion perspective. Thus, technically, attendees can be ordered to leave if they “wander away from the topic under discussion” or “move about between the council table and the public.”

The decorum bylaw also applies to reporters or residents who want to record meetings for their own library. For instance, “the use of a mechanical or electronic voice recording device is authorized during town council meetings on the condition that the equipment is used silently and without in any way disturbing the proceedings. The recording device must remain in the user’s physical possession.” This might indicate that a reporter or resident cannot leave his or her recorder running in the council chamber while taking a bathroom break.

Back in 2005, The Suburban reported that another Hampstead council meeting-related bylaw says that only council members “and officers assisting them, may be filmed or photographed by means of a still, video or television camera or any other device for recording images, and only during question period, may the people asking the questions of the council members also be photographed or filmed.” However, The Suburban was assured it would not be prosecuted if it took a picture of an audience member, for example, disrupting the meeting from the floor. Also, no action was taken during the fractious 2009 election campaign when some council meetings were filmed by a supporter of mayoral candidate and former councillor David Sternthal.

Another aspect of the decorum bylaw, the prohibition against “shouting, heckling, singing, making noise or any other gesture likely to negatively impact the proceedings.” Pretty much every one of these has been violated in the last few years – except for the singing.

On the other hand, Hampstead is not unique in designating a maximum of 30 minutes for their question period. However, not too many area municipalities follow that rule to the letter. Two Hampstead question periods at one meeting lasted a total four hours, ironically after an unsuccessful attempt to actually restrict the time to 30 minutes because of lengthy question periods at previous meetings.

In Montreal West, a recently posted 2008 bylaw decrees if a resident has more than two dogs or four cats, he or she “shall be considered to be operating a kennel or shelter.” The bylaw also says kennels and shelters are not allowed in the town’s residential zone. A permit must be obtained to open a kennel or shelter altogether.

However, there is one exception to the dog and cat limit rule. “In the event that a female dog or cat gives birth to a litter of puppies or kittens, [they] may be kept by the owner for a period not exceeding three months.”

As they say, ignorance is no excuse. Read your municipality’s bylaws.

‘Breed specific’ dropped from proposed CSL ‘dangerous’ dog bylaw, The Monitor

Leave a comment

‘Breed specific’ dropped from proposed CSL ‘dangerous’ dog bylaw
The Monitor
by Martin C. Barry

Côte St. Luc city council has given second reading to a proposed new bylaw that will compel the owners or custodians of “dangerous” dogs to muzzle them – although it will not specify any particular breed of dog. “We made a decision at this point that the bylaw does not call out any specific breed,” Mayor Anthony Housefather said, after the legislation was tabled on March 16 at Côte St. Luc city hall.

“We’re defining a dangerous dog as being a dog which has a tendency or disposition to attack, bite, threaten or injure with or without provocation any persons, property or other animals, or with or without provocation or physical injury attacks, bites or threatens any person, property or domestic animal or has been trained for dog fighting or to attack …

“So we are not calling out pitbulls or any other breed of dog, and saying that everyone from certain species needs to be muzzled,” he added. “That is currently the council’s intention. So for those owners of certain breeds that lobbied us, your views were listened to and we decided not to go down that path for the moment.”

“I’m very proud to move this resolution,” said Councillor Mike Cohen, who sponsored the bylaw. “I’ve had people come to me actually the last couple of years about dangerous dogs, and I think forcing them to have a muzzle on their dog will give the opportunity for the authorities, the police, to do something when someone complains.”

According to Councillor Glenn Nashen, Côte St. Luc had a dog muzzle bylaw dating back to the 1950s, although “the application became difficult if not impossible because several of the people that were named to enforce it didn’t exist anymore, such as the chief of police of Côte St. Luc and dog catchers that maybe existed in the ’50s and ’60s.”

Last summer, a group of dog owners who are regular users of the City of Côte St. Luc’s dog run asked city council to take measures that would ban Pit Bulls from the run. In January, when council first served notice it would be updating its dog control bylaw, Housefather had said:

“We will be targeting breeds, because we believe that there have been sufficient incidents in communities surrounding us that we’ve read about to warrant a concern. There are municipalities across North America that have pro-actively adopted this bylaw and we feel that there are certain breeds that really need to be regulated.”

All dogs in Cote St. Luc must be vaccinated, Gazette

Leave a comment

Click: all-dogs-in-cote-st-luc-must-be-vaccinated-gazette-1995-03-09