Discussions needed on value of MMC: CSL councillor

Leave a comment

Côte St. Luc councillors Glenn Nashen and Ruth Kovac visibly grimaced during a council meeting, when it came time to approve the city’s annual contribution to the Montreal Metropolitan Community.

The MMC, created in 2001, represents and speaks for the entire Greater Montreal Region and develops plans, programs and strategies for the community in that area.

Each year, Côte St. Luc council members declare that they are reluctantly and grudgingly paying the bill, pointing out that it is required by provincial law. This year’s payment is $508,000, paid in two installments. Each year, at least two councillors symbolically vote against the payment.

“This year’s payment is a three percent increase over last year,” said Councillor Steven Erdelyi, who introduced the resolution to make the payment. “My personal opinion is we don’t get the value for that money. They do produce some very good reports, and they are helpful on some fronts, but not to the extent of the money we’re paying them.”

Councillor Glenn Nashen, who with Kovac enthusiastically voted against the resolution, called for a discussion on the MMC between different levels of government.

“We don’t see the true value of this extra layer of unelected representation,” Nashen added. “In this day and age, we should look at how to get better value for our money, and it really behooves our MNA, David Birnbaum, the provincial government and the City of Montreal to sit around the table and figure out a better method of providing the services, but for much better value.”

Kovac said the semi-annual MMC report is nice but is only in French.

(We checked and some MMC paperwork is in English. The MMC’s website is mostly in French, except for five documents that can be seen on the site and downloaded. There is no English section per se on the site.)

We mentioned Côte St. Luc’s grievance to Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre, as he is also president of the MMC.

“You won’t have a fight between Côte St. Luc and myself,” the mayor told The Suburban.

Historic vote for Montreal Mayor

Leave a comment

What a week at Montreal City Hall!

Michael Applebaum has made the local history books becoming the first English-speaking mayor in 100 years. Also, Montreal has not seen a Jew in the Mayor’s chair since Joseph Shubert was appointed Acting Mayor of Montreal for a period of three months, on August 29, 1927.

Although the vote was a squeaker with Applebaum taking 31 votes to Richard Deschamps’ 29 votes, there were three spoiled ballots which could have shifted the outcome the other way. The vote for interim mayor was a secret ballot of Council members only since Mayor Gerald Tremblay stepped down less than one year prior to the next general election on November 3, 2013.

Councillors Ruth Kovac and Glenn J. Nashen with CDN-NDG Borough Mayor Michael Applebaum

The fact that a by-election was not needed saved Montreal taxpayers about $10,000,000 according to media reports.

Michael Applebaum has shown himself as an honest, hard working and dedicated Borough Mayor and Chair of the Executive Committee. I have seen him in action with regard to the expansion of the Jewish General Hospital as well as other issues in the Cote des Neiges-NDG borough. He is on top of his files and thoroughly understands the needs of his constituents.

Any criticism of his French-language skills is ridiculous. His French is excellent, regardless of his accent. Even Montreal opposition leader Louise Harel said that she wished she spoke English as well as Applebaum speaks French. In fact, he didn’t even speak a word of English during his pre-vote address to Council! (It wouldn’t have hurt).

Applebaum will now lead not only Montreal City Council and his borough, but also the Agglomeration Council responsible for regional services including the Montreal Island demerged municipalities, the Ville Marie downtown borough and the Montreal Metropolitan Community.

Councillors Ruth Kovac, Glenn J. Nashen and Sam Goldbloom discuss local issues with Cote des Neiges – NDG Borough Mayor Michael Applebaum (2nd from left)

Huge responsibilities, demands and expectations lie ahead for Applebaum. If he succeeds in cleaning up the image and reputation of Montreal and setting the course for a solid future as an independent mayor don’t be surprised to see his name on next year’s ballot (regardless of today’s intentions).

So, congratulations Mayor Applebaum. I wish you great success and courage in all the lies ahead. As a Cote Saint-Lucer I’m looking forward to your leadership and vision to benefit all those who reside on the Island of Montreal and across the region.

Planning for Côte St. Luc’s future

1 Comment

Planning for Côte St. Luc’s future
Dida Berku
The Free Press, October 25, 2011

Earlier this month, on behalf of the City of Côte St. Luc, I presented a brief to the commission hearings the Metropolitan Land Use and Development Plan (or PMAD in French). This is a 20-year plan for the 82 cities of the Montreal metropolitan area

Once this plan is adopted later this year, it will guide development towards a sustainable future through higher density housing on and off the island, improved mass transit and the protection of green and natural spaces. 

As this regional plan could influence CSL and other west-end communities towards the year 2031, my recommendations addressed all three development challenges as they affect our sector. In the category of transportation, CSL’s position is that the priorities for major road works should absolutely include building the Cavendish-Royalmount- Cavendish road extension both for cars and rapid transit. I also recommended improving rapid bus transit to the Metro (either through protected rapid transit lanes or direct express access through the rail yards to the Metro). Thirdly, I asked that the AMT add a train stop for train service along the Blainville-St. Jérome line, which ends downtown, at the Côte St. Luc Shopping Centre. 

In the field of the environment, I highlighted that many cities of the region, including CSL, have adopted the resolution in support of the Montreal Archipelago Ecological Park. As well, CSL supports the “common vision for the green and blue belt of Greater Montreal.” And of course I emphasized that our city is not in favour of the development of the Meadowbrook golf course and other natural spaces, which serve as natural buffer zones and provide valuable green space to existing communities. 

However just being in favour of greenspace preservation is not enough. Cities have to have the powers and political will to implement measures to protect green natural spaces. 

This leads me to the third recommendation in the area of land use. It is generally recognized that there are many natural areas on and off the island that are just non-buildable due to their proximity to risks and nuisances, such as flood zones and railway yards. So far, cities do not have all the powers they need to set safe set-backs to prevent residential housing in these areas, many of which have been historically zoned for development.

“As such I recommended that all cities of the Montreal metropolitan area be given the power to adopt guidelines for safe setback distances that limit residential developments adjacent to risk zones and railway rights-of-way. These recommendations are modeled on guidelines from Ontario, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and the Railway Association of Canada and reflect the official positions of the railway companies themselves. I hope the PMAD commissioners will take these recommendations into account. 

To follow the PMAD hearings and proposals, visit www.pmad.ca. If you want to submit your comments regarding CSL recommendations, please write to me at dberku@cotesaintluc.org

Dida Berku is the councilllor responsible for finance, the Cavendish extension, Meadowbrook golf course, ethics and CLD (local economic development).

Meadowbrook activists to join environmentalists to plan strategy

Leave a comment

On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 the public is invited to attend a meeting of a coalition of environmental organizations, including Les Amis de Meadowbrook, who will be organizing a common front for the preservation of our environmental heritage in the Montreal area.

This meeting is in preparation for  public hearings set to begin September 2 by the Montreal Metropolitan Community on its new urban plan (the PMAD – Plan métropolitaine d’amenagement et de développement).

At the meeting on August 16, organizers will explain the concept of the Green Belt for Montreal – La Ceinture Verte du Grand Montréal.  The meeting will take place at 7pm at the Grande Salle – Notre Dame de la Salette, 3535 avenue du Parc (métro Place-des-Arts).

The Green Belt for Montreal and Southwestern Quebec is also known as the Parc Écologique de l’Archipel de Montréal. It would form a stretch of forests and floodplains, agricultural lands, wetlands and islands linked together by green corridors and streams, and the great rivers of Southwestern Québec.

It is hoped that an action plan to create such a green belt would be enshrined in Le Plan métropolitain d’aménagement et de développement (PMAD) de la Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal – before it is adopted by the end of this year.

For more information

Tremblay should use regional body to get better deal

Leave a comment

Tremblay should use regional body to get better deal

Off-island suburbs should pay more to the core city

By HENRY AUBIN, The Gazette, January 12, 2010

Many Montreal islanders will be upset Wednesday when the Tremblay administration unveils its 2010 budget. Some reports say Montrealers’ taxes will rise by roughly six per cent (once the water tax, business tax, and other lesser taxes are rolled into the property tax). That would be triple the inflation rate. It doesn’t count the surtax that some boroughs will charge. Meanwhile, the island’s suburbs are also bracing for another hard hit by Montreal on agglomeration expenses.

In October, an internal city-hall document indicated that a 16-per-cent tax increase spread over four years might be in the cards. Whether or not anything that severe actually happens, the island clearly faces the fiscal blues for the foreseeable future.

Let’s consider two scenarios for next few years.

Scenario A: In the face of high taxes in the city and the island suburbs, more young families continue to move in droves to the fiscally gentle off-island suburbs. Economic development follows suit. The departing tax base contributes to further deterioration of the island’s services and infrastructure. This scenario, in other words, calls for prolonging the decades-long enfeeblement of Montreal Island relative to the off-island.

Scenario B: Mayor Gérald Tremblay ceases to do nothing about the metropolitan region’s longstanding fiscal imbalance, in which islanders pay high municipal taxes and off-islanders pay almost nothing to support the city on which their municipalities’ prosperity depends.

Tremblay happens to have an ideal vehicle for change: the under-used Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal, the regional body that then-municipal-affairs minister Louise Harel wisely created nine years ago, but which Tremblay and his fellow mayors in the region have let languish. In an essay in La Presse yesterday, Luc Hétu, author of a recent book on Montreal politics, Une ville sous tutelle, asks a trenchant question: “What keeps the CMM … from publicly examining new ways of financing Montreal that are essential for its development?”

Quebec has the power to impose a fiscal regime on the region that would make the off-island help the city. However, it has never acted and it never will: No provincial party wants to ruffle off-islanders, given their voting leverage in Quebec elections. (It’s politically easier to download the city’s costs on to the island’s suburbs, since they lack such leverage.)

The office of Montreal’s mayor is the only place that any initiative can possibly come from. Under the law creating the CMM, the island and the off-island each has 14 seats on the 28-member CMM council; in case of a tie, however, Montreal’s mayor gets the deciding vote.

Tremblay could theoretically ram through the CMM a measure making the off-island share the burden of paying for the aging city (and get Quebec to accept it). But the lasting bitterness that this would create would harm the region over the long haul.

Far better for Tremblay to form a task force of island and off-island politicians who are on the CMM council to explore the issue and make recommendations.

One idea worthy of consideration is the Minneapolis solution. I visited that city in 1999 to see how its tax-base sharing worked, and I was very impressed. Five years later, in a report on how to strengthen Montreal, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development also touted the Minneapolis method.

Like the Montreal region, the Minneapolis region has scores of suburbs. When a new commercial or industrial project goes up there, the host municipality keeps 60 per cent of its property taxes (unlike 100 per cent in the Montreal region). The other 40 per cent goes to municipalities with the lowest per-capita commercial-industrial tax base.

Under this spread-the-wealth method, the region’s disadvantaged areas benefit from development elsewhere. The formula could be adjusted so that a municipality that has few stores and no industries does not become like a Persian Gulf emirate.

Is this concept not good enough for the region’s mayors? Fine. Let them recommend something else.

Tremblay has already wasted six years since the OECD’s recommendation. Now, with the island possibly facing years of tax hikes that exceed inflation, he needs to knuckle down and find a fairer way to share costs. The alternative is further drift and decline.

CSL payment to MMC in protest

Comments Off on CSL payment to MMC in protest

CSL payment to MMC in protest

By Joel Goldenberg, The Suburban


Côte St. Luc council voted 6-1 to pay the first of two $351,000 installments to the region-wide Montreal Metropolitan Community, but did so under protest.

At first, a 4-3 bare majority approving the payment looked likely as opponents Glenn Nashen, Allan Levine and Mitchell Brownstein said the MMC has not been fulfilling its original purpose. The only kudo offered was for the design of its documents and presentations. Mayor Anthony Housefather pointed out that the council is legally obliged to vote for the payment.

But before a resolution could be passed to make the payment, Housefather suggested that the council’s reservations be added to their resolution as a form of protest.

The MMC was created Jan. 1, 2001 and serves 82 municipalities. According to its website, the MMC’s goals are to “provide the Montreal metropolitan area with a common, shared vision, which will be followed by a consistent economic development plan and a metropolitan land use and development plan to make the region internationally competitive; ensure harmonious, equitable development throughout the MMC’s territory while providing a quality living environment for the region’s citizens; establish a truly metropolitan financing system based on diversified revenue sources to finance metropolitan activities and municipal activities in specific sectors; and harmonize government and regional organization policies and programs with the MMC’s activities.”

“The purpose for which the MMC was created has not been met, they’re not fulfilling their mandate,” said councillor Dida Berku, agreeing with the opponents. “Their purpose was to prevent urban sprawl, reinforce the centre and spread costs. They’re doing the opposite. Its budget is inflated.”

Berku agreed and they both began suggesting revisions on the spot to the council.”

Nashen, who also routinely voted against payments to the former Montreal Urban Community in the 1990s along with a rotating set of colleagues on council, maintained his opposition to the MMC payment.

“I think it is important not to have a unanimous vote in favour of a resolution that we are philosophically against even if we are obliged by law to pay it,” he said. “I see no value for our taxpayers for this enormous expense and I am opposed to this extra layer of unelected government that has not demonstrated any achievements.

“I do not believe in taxation without elected representation.”

CSL Council pays MMC $700K, Nashen against

Comments Off on CSL Council pays MMC $700K, Nashen against


CSL council agrees to pay MMC $700,000 fee

Leave a comment

CSL council agrees to pay MMC $700,000 fee
Councillors Kovac and Nashen only dissenting votes on big-ticket bill
West End Chronicle
January 16, 2007

Côte St. Luc city council has agreed to pay the Montreal Metropolitan Community a fee that is larger than the City’s annual budget for public security.

The MMC, a governing body whose purpose has been questioned in other Montreal-area communities, is one of several layers of regional administration the Province created over the past seven years, in conjunction with the Agglomeration Council and the aborted municipal merger scheme.

While the Agglomeration Council coordinates major municipal services for Montreal Island, the lesser-known MMC has a much vaguer mandate to encourage long-term plans for the development of a wide swath of the greater Montreal region.

It operates on a budget of nearly $100 million annually. Côte St. Luc’s MMC payment for 2007 – the first installment of which was passed by council last Monday – totals around $700,000. Meanwhile, Côte St. Luc allocates about $600,000 each year for its public security needs.

Councillors Ruth Kovac and Glenn Nashen, who earned a reputation on the pre-merger city council for voting together on many issues, decided last Monday evening to stand out as the only councillors opposing the decision to pay the bill.

Councillor Mitchell Brownstein, another veteran councillor with a long history of voting in tandem with Kovac and Nashen, did not join them this time. “What does the MMC do?” Baily Road resident Avrum Shtern asked Mayor Anthony Housefather during question period.

“I mean, it sounds to me like a bureaucratic nightmare. Does it do anything? Couldn’t we just convince those guys who forced the merger on us to use the money for essential services? … $700,000 can go a long way for public security or fire or parks.”

Housefather said he agreed the MMC is highly bureaucratized. “I have no idea of what they’re giving us,” he said.

While pointing out that Montreal islanders are paying a large part of the bill for extending the Metro to Laval, he

added that it would be more appropriate for a division of regional costs to be worked out equitably.

Explaining her reasons for voting against the MMC payment, as she also did last year, Kovac said, “For me it’s another layer of government that hasn’t produced any results and I resent the costs that are implicated.” She said MMC staff hadn’t produced anything over the past year, other than a document issued in French only. “So I’m not served by it and therefore I will vote against it continuously.”

Nashen gave two reasons for his opposing vote. “I don’t really see the value of the $700,000 that we invest on an annual basis,” he said. While acknowledging that two suburban mayors sit on the MMC, Nashen said no information comes back that he’s aware of. “I think that the level of taxation is not commensurate with the representation that we have.”


Split CSL council votes to pay MMC

Leave a comment

Split CSL council votes to pay MMC

West End Chronicle

Article online since March 21 2006

Chronicle, Martin C. Barry

CSL councillor Glenn Nashen, along with two other veteran councillors, voted against the MMC payment. By MARTIN C. BARRY The Chronicle

Despite dissenting votes from three veteran Côte St. Luc city councillors, council has agreed to pay the first installment of a $635,000 annual fee to the Montreal Metropolitan Community – a regional government whose purpose is under question. The MMC is one of several layers of administration Quebec created over the past seven years or so in the Montreal region, in conjunction with its aborted municipal merger scheme.

While the Agglomeration Council coordinates major municipal services for Montreal Island, the MMC has a vague mandate to oversee long-term plans for the development of a wide swath extending north, south, east and west of the immediate Montreal region. The MMC operates on a $96 million annual budget and serves 3.4 million residents in 63 municipalities.

Councillors Ruth Kovac, Glenn Nashen and Mitchell Brownstein, who earned a reputation on Côte St. Luc’s pre-merger city council for voting together on many issues, decided last Monday evening to go against council’s decision to pay the MMC. Nashen said the resolution was something council should not be adopting unanimously. “I think we should voice our dissent … I don’t know what kind of democratic body this is … Essentially it seems like another level of taxation without representation.” Brownstein added, “I will be voting against it to show that this does not pass by majority in Côte St. Luc.”

However, Mayor Anthony Housefather said that legally Côte St. Luc is obliged by the Province to make the contribution and that failing to do so would only result in interest being levied. “The law requires us to be a member and to pay our share,” he said. “It’s one of these things that we’re stuck with until the law changes.”

Councillor Dida Berku, who gained experience sitting on an MMC environmental commission as a member of the old borough council, cited an example of the regional body’s inefficiency. “For the entire time that we were on the commission, we could not get consensus from the members who were representing Laval and Longueuil for them to bring up their standards so that they would be at the same level with the City of Montreal,” she said. “There’s just so many levels that we have on the island right now and in the region – so many levels of government – it’s unfortunate we aren’t able to move this island and this region with some level of consensus,” she added. “Unfortunately right now, the MMC has not been productive. It would be nice if we could find a way to work together for the common good, and not just spend $600,000 for basically show and not for content. But, unfortunately, I have to report that at the environment level, I felt there was a lack of coordinated leadership.”

Resolution requesting MMC bilingual services

Comments Off on Resolution requesting MMC bilingual services



Whereas the Minister of Municipal Affairs and of the Metropole, Louise Harel, has proposed the creation of a Metropolitan Montreal Council to replace the Montreal Urban Community on January 1, 2001; and

Whereas the Minister has established a committee which includes the Chairman of the Union des Municipalités de Banlieue sur l’Île de Montréal (UMBM) and Councillors to look into certain issues such as the structure of the Metropolitan Montreal Council and to prepare recommendations for the government; and

Whereas the City of Côte Saint-Luc wishes to ensure that English-speaking services are properly provided for in this reorganization;

It was




THAT the City of Côte Saint-Luc calls upon the Chairman of the UMBM to take the position that all services of the Metropolitan Montreal Council must be offered in English as well as in French and that the Metropolitan Montreal Council take appropriate steps to ensure that a sufficient number of employees that serve the public have a working knowledge of both official languages in order that unilingual English speaking citizens be well served.

THAT the City of Côte Saint-Luc calls upon the Chairman of the UMBM to take the position that an equity program should be established to ensure that a proportional number of members of the English-speaking community are hired by the Metropolitan Montreal Council.

THAT the City of Côte Saint-Luc also calls upon the Chairman of the UMBM to take the position that all documents and public signage of the Metropolitan Montreal Council be in English as well as French and that he seeks to have all of these guarantees included in the constituting document.

THAT this Resolution be sent to all Mayors and Councillors of municipalities within the UMBM, of municipalities within the proposed Metropolitan Montreal Council and the City of Montreal, for their support.

THAT this resolution be sent to all other municipalities with bilingual status in the Province of Quebec.

THAT this Resolution be sent to the Premier of Quebec and all members of the National Assembly of Quebec.

THAT a copy of this resolution be sent to the Prime Minister of Canada, Minister for Canadian Heritage, Minister for Intergovernmental Affairs of Canada, Member of Parliament for Mount Royal, Commissioner of Official Languages and members of the media.